Say Goodbye to Messy Joins: Fuzzy Matching in Power BI Explained
Fuzzy matching is a technique used to compare and match data that is similar but not exactly the same. It helps identify records that are likely referring to the same entity, even if there are minor differences such as typos, formatting variations, or extra spaces.
It's useful when dealing with:
- Typos (e.g., "Jhon" vs "John")
- Abbreviations (e.g., "Corp." vs "Corporation")
- Extra/missing spaces
- Case mismatches
This technique is essential in data cleansing, record linkage, and data integration tasks where data comes from multiple inconsistent sources.
Origins in Computer Science: Fuzzy matching has roots in approximate string matching, developed for search engines, AI, and bioinformatics.
Algorithms: Classic algorithms include:
- Levenshtein Distance (edit distance)
- Jaro-Winkler Distance
- Soundex (phonetic matching)
- TF-IDF with cosine similarity (used in document comparisons)
These methods helped search engines, credit card fraud detection, and CRM deduplication from the 1970s onward.
In Business Intelligence: The need to merge messy datasets (e.g., customer names, addresses) brought fuzzy matching into tools like SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS), Excel, and laterPower BI.
Logical Concept of Fuzzy Matching
Fuzzy matching works by:
- Comparing strings using asimilarity algorithm.
- Scoring how similar two values are (e.g., 0.0 to 1.0).
- Returning matches above a certain threshold.
Example:
"Acme Inc" vs "ACME Incorporated" might score0.85 similarity, and if your threshold is 0.8, it's considered a match.
Where and When to Use Fuzzy Matching
Use Cases:
- Customer Deduplication ("Jon Smith", "John Smith")
- Address Matching ( "123 Main St", "123 Main Street")
- Company Merging ("ABC Ltd", "ABC Limited")
- Data Consolidation (Joining datasets from different systems with inconsistent naming)
- When your data is already standardized.
- When exact match is critical (e.g., invoice numbers).
- In large datasets with poor quality: fuzzy matching can be resource-heavy.
- Performance: Fuzzy merges are slower than exact merges.
- Quality: Review results—false positives/negatives may occur.
- Data Volume: Use on smaller datasets or pre-filtered data.
- Maintainability: Use transformation tables for better control.
Published on:
Learn moreRelated posts
Power BI app Copilot: AI scoped to the curated content in an app (Preview)
Announcing Power BI app Copilot, now in preview. With app-scoped Copilot, users can search for reports in an app plus ask questions and get co...
Deprecation Announcement: Office Online Server Retirement and What It Means for Power BI Report Server Users
What’s Changing? Microsoft has announced that Office Online Server (OOS) will be retired effective December 31, 2026. As a result, PBIRS users...
Introducing Power BI Controller: Streamlining Storytelling with Bulk Operations (Preview)
This feature was developed in direct response to feedback from our user community and is designed to provide an efficient tool for managing mu...
Understanding The “Copilot Analyzed Only Part Of The Model Due To Its Size” Warning In Power BI Copilot
If you’re using Power BI Copilot you may have seen the following warning message: What does it mean? What causes it? What can you do to ...
Automating Power BI Load Testing with Fabric Notebooks – Part 1: Capturing Real Queries
Load testing is essential when working with Microsoft Fabric capacity. With limited resources, deploying a Power BI report without testing can...

