That's not my name! How to use Azure Policy to enforce resource naming conventions in your DevOps pipelines

Let’s talk about Azure naming conventions
I know, I know, you’re probably thinking, “Seriously? We’re gonna talk about names?” But trust me, this stuff matters.
Why Should You Care About Names?
Think about it like this: imagine you’ve got a massive garage full of tools, but nothing’s labeled. Nightmare, right? That’s kinda what it’s like when you’ve got a ton of Azure resources with random names. It’s a mess, and nobody wants to deal with that.
Good names make life easier. You can tell at a glance what something is, where it belongs, and what it’s for. Plus, when it comes to tracking costs or making sure you’re following the rules, good names are a lifesaver.
What Microsoft Says About It
Microsoft’s got some ideas about how to name stuff in Azure. They suggest something like this:
<org>-<proj>-<env>-<region>-<resource-type>-<instance>
So, if you’re working on a web app for Contoso, it might look like:
contoso-webapp-prod-eastus-app-01
Not too shabby, right? You can tell it’s for Contoso, it’s a web app, it’s in production, sitting in East US, and it’s an app service. The ‘01’ at the end is just in case you need more than one.
The problem with doing this manually
Trying to make sure everyone follows these rules manually is a pain in the butt. People forget, they get lazy, or they just don’t care. And then you’ve got a mess on your hands.
Plus, going through and checking all the names by hand? Boring. And fixing mistakes after the fact? Even worse.
How to make it suck less
This is where the cool part comes in. We can use Azure CLI and Azure Policy to do the heavy lifting for us. Basically, we set up a system that checks the names before anything gets created. If the name’s wrong, it doesn’t let it through.
Here’s the general idea:
- Figure out what pattern you want your names to follow - welcome to Regex hell!
- Write a little script that checks if a name matches that pattern
- Hook that script in your Azure DevOps pipeline
Now, every time someone tries to create something, it has to pass the name check first. Pretty slick, huh? But if we just wrote the script in DevOps, then it would only apply if someone tries to deploy resources via DevOps. It wouldn’t catch non compliant resources that are created for example in the Azure Portal. Our hero? It’s once again Azure Policy! Azure Policy makes sure that regardless how a resource is being created, it needs to comply to the policy that you set.
Use Azure Policy
We have several options now… either create the policy with Azure CLI or deploy the policy definition and policy assignment with Bicep.
I’ll cover how to use Bicep for this:
targetScope = 'subscription'
resource policyDefinition 'Microsoft.Authorization/policyDefinitions@2021-06-01' = {
name: 'enforce-resource-naming'
properties: {
displayName: 'Enforce resource naming pattern'
mode: 'All'
policyRule: {
if: {
field: 'name'
notMatch: '^[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,}-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,}-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,}-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,}-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,}-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,}$'
}
then: {
effect: 'deny'
}
}
parameters: {}
metadata: {
category: 'Naming'
}
}
}
resource policyAssignment 'Microsoft.Authorization/policyAssignments@2021-06-01' = {
name: 'enforce-resource-naming-assignment'
properties: {
displayName: 'Enforce resource naming pattern assignment'
policyDefinitionId: policyDefinition.id
scope: subscription().id
}
}
If we now deploy a resource:
resource storageAccount 'Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts@2021-02-01' = {
name: 'contoso-webapp-prod-weu-stg-01' // This name must comply with the policy
location: 'westeurope'
sku: {
name: 'Standard_LRS'
}
kind: 'StorageV2'
properties: {
accessTier: 'Hot'
}
}
Azure policy will check if the name complies. If not, it will block the deployment due to the deny in the policy.
You can also check your previously created resources with
az policy state list --query "[?complianceState=='NonCompliant']"
Make it work in your DevOps pipeline
And the best part? You can hook it right into your DevOps pipeline. So before you deploy anything, you can double-check that it’s all the way you wanted it in the first place. It runs the az policy state list
command to check whether any resources are non-compliant. If violations are detected, the pipeline exits with a non zero status which causes the pipeline to fail.
trigger:
- main
pool:
vmImage: 'ubuntu-latest'
variables:
azureSubscription: '<Your-Service-Connection>'
resourceGroupName: '<Your resource group name>'
location: 'westeurope'
steps:
# Install Azure CLI and Bicep
- task: AzureCLI@2
inputs:
azureSubscription: $(azureSubscription)
scriptType: 'bash'
scriptLocation: 'inlineScript'
inlineScript: |
# Install Azure CLI Bicep extension
az bicep install
displayName: 'Install Bicep CLI'
# Deploy Bicep File to Azure
- task: AzureCLI@2
inputs:
azureSubscription: $(azureSubscription)
scriptType: 'bash'
scriptLocation: 'inlineScript'
inlineScript: |
echo "Deploying Bicep template..."
az group create --name $(resourceGroupName) --location $(location)
# Deploy Bicep file
az deployment group create \
--resource-group $(resourceGroupName) \
--template-file main.bicep
displayName: 'Deploy Bicep Template'
# Check Azure Policy Compliance
- task: AzureCLI@2
inputs:
azureSubscription: $(azureSubscription)
scriptType: 'bash'
scriptLocation: 'inlineScript'
inlineScript: |
echo "Checking Azure Policy compliance..."
# Check for any non-compliant resources in the resource group
compliance_results=$(az policy state list --resource-group $(resourceGroupName) --query "[?complianceState=='NonCompliant'].{resourceId:resourceId, policyAssignmentName:policyAssignment}" --output table)
if [ -n "$compliance_results" ]; then
echo "Non-compliant resources detected:"
echo "$compliance_results"
exit 1 # Fail the pipeline if there are non-compliant resources
else
echo "All resources are compliant with Azure Policy."
fi
displayName: 'Check Policy Compliance'
Conclusion
Naming conventions aren’t exactly the most thrilling topic. But trust me, getting this stuff right can save you a ton of headaches down the road. It’s like organizing your garage – it’s a pain to do, but once it’s done, life gets so much easier. Azure Policy does the heavy lifting here for us and hooking that approach into your Azure DevOps pipeline will just make sure that you’ll never ever have to think about naming again. You are welcome!
Published on:
Learn moreRelated posts
Powering Real-Time Messaging at Scale with Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Teams, Copilot, Azure Communication Services and many other product offerings from Microsoft, rely on a unified messaging platform t...
Azure SQL Cryptozoology AI Embeddings Lab Now Available!
Missed out on MS Build 2025? No worries! Our lab is now available for your exploration. Dive into a unique cryptozoology experience using Azur...
Vector Support Public Preview now extended to Azure SQL MI
We are thrilled to announce that Azure SQL Managed Instance now supports Vector type and functions in public preview. This builds on the mome...
Building Multi-Agent AI Apps in Java with Spring AI and Azure Cosmos DB!
As AI-driven apps become more sophisticated, there’s an increasing need for them to mimic collaborative problem solving – like a t...
What runs ChatGPT, Sora, DeepSeek & Llama on Azure? (feat. Mark Russinovich)
Build and run your AI apps and agents at scale with Azure. Orchestrate multi-agent apps and high-scale inference solutions using open-source a...
Azure Cosmos DB TV – Everything New in Azure Cosmos DB from Microsoft Build 2025
Microsoft Build 2025 brought major innovations to Azure Cosmos DB, and in Episode 105 of Azure Cosmos DB TV, Principal Program Manager Mark Br...
Azure DevOps with GitHub Repositories – Your path to Agentic AI
GitHub Copilot has evolved beyond a coding assistant in the IDE into an agentic teammate – providing actionable feedback on pull requests, fix...