Loading...

There are no temporary fixes (just permanent shortcuts)

There are no temporary fixes (just permanent shortcuts)

A while back, I wrote about A hill to die on: there are no tiny changes, just changes we underestimate. If you missed it, give it a read. But there’s a related myth we need to dismantle: “It’s just a temporary fix.”

Ah yes, the sacred chant of backlog triage. We all know how it goes:

“This is just to get us unblocked.”

“Let’s be pragmatic; we’ll clean it up later.”

“We’ll write a proper solution next sprint.”

Spoiler: we won’t.

When did temporary start meaning indefinite?

Once a fix goes live, it’s not temporary; it’s a default. It becomes part of how the system works, how people rely on it, how your future self has to navigate it. That workaround? It’s now someone’s expectation. That duct-taped dependency? It’s in production, baby. Every “just for now” decision is a long-term liability waiting for an excuse to dig in its heels.

We ship intent, not just code

Think about it. That quick-and-dirty fix ships with no expiration date, no conditions, no built-in cleanup plan. And nobody, not the code, not your CI pipeline, not the product owner, is going to magically remember to “circle back”. So it stays. And much like I argued in tiny changes, even the smallest-seeming fix can have wide ripple effects: Unexpected bugs. Fragile dependencies. Future blockers. All because we told ourselves this wasn’t the real solution. But it is. It’s live. It counts.

The real problem: we treat code like a whiteboard

We think we can scribble something quick and erase it later. But software doesn’t work like that. Once it’s deployed, it’s not just code:it’s behavior. It has inertia. It gets integrated into other things. The longer it sits there, the harder it is to untangle. So we end up building systems that are a patchwork of “for now” glued together with hope and good intentions.

What we should say

Instead of calling it a temporary fix, be honest about what you’re doing:

  • “This is a compromise with risk”
  • “We’re introducing technical debt deliberately”
  • “We’re choosing speed over sustainability”

Then, if you go ahead with it:

  • Write it down like a bug Don’t hide it behind a TODO; give it an owner and a deadline.
  • Make the cost visible. Add it to the roadmap as real work, not invisible hope.
  • Flag it in review. Code reviewers should treat “we’ll fix this later” as a blocker unless there’s a plan.

Let’s stop pretending our shortcuts don’t have long-term consequences. If we keep saying “we’ll fix it later” without specifying when and how, we’re not just lying to others, we’re lying to ourselves. You can’t measure what you won’t acknowledge. You can’t clean up what you never wrote down. And you sure as hell can’t call something “temporary” if there’s no plan to remove it.

So the next time you feel the urge to sneak in a fix and promise yourself it’s only for now, just remember:

There are no temporary fixes. Only permanent shortcuts you haven’t regretted yet.

Published on:

Learn more
Need help with this product?

We can help you with There are no temporary fixes (just permanent shortcuts)

If you want help implementing, troubleshooting, or improving this product, contact us and we’ll point you in the right direction.

Luise Freese: Consultant & MVP
Luise Freese: Consultant & MVP

Recent content on Luise Freese: Consultant & MVP

Share post:

Related posts

You are holding GitHub Copilot Wrong!

Most developers think that one can’t really use GitHub Copilot wrong. There is a chat interface that lets you also choose a model, so th...

10 months ago

You are holding GitHub Copilot Wrong!

Part 0 showed why constant prompting, re-prompting, and steering GitHub Copilot feels fragile. Not because Copilot is unreliable, but because ...

10 months ago

Building a Multi-Hierarchy Ticket Classification System (Because Keywords Aren't Enough)

Look, I love a good keyword-based system as much as the next developer. They’re fast, predictable, and when your user says “VPN,&r...

10 months ago

Secretless cross-tenant dataverse access

Client secrets are like hiding your house key under the mat; easy to grab and impossible to audit. Certificates are just slightly better, beca...

1 year ago

How Azure CLI handles your tokens and what you might be ignoring

Running az login feels like magic. A browser pops up, you pick an account, and from then on, everything just works. No more passwords, no more...

1 year ago

How Dev Proxy teaches you to make your apps more resilient

I added Microsoft Dev Proxy to my Mermaid → Dataverse converter, because I wanted to test how it handled rate limits and API errors. What I go...

1 year ago

Building Azure functions that never store secrets — ever

What if your function could hit Microsoft Graph with no client secrets, no certs, and no Key Vault entries? That is exactly what a Managed id...

1 year ago

Introducing Mermaid to Dataverse Converter

Why diagrams matter (and why they usually fail us) Entity-Relationship Diagrams (ERDs) are the universal shorthand for talking about data mode...

1 year ago

It’s OK to be seen trying

It’s OK to be seen trying Somewhere along the way, we started believing that you’re only allowed to speak after you’ve figured everything out....

1 year ago

Stuck in pilot - Part 1: no foundations, no future

“We just need to test the AI. We’ll figure out the data later.” That sentence has quietly killed more AI pilots than any model failure ever ...

1 year ago

Newsletter

Get the latest Dynamics 365 and Power Platform content in your inbox

A curated digest of community blogs, product news, videos, and podcasts — delivered without the noise.

Weekly updates Unsubscribe anytime Fresh community picks
We use your email only for the newsletter and you can unsubscribe at any time.
By subscribing, you agree to the privacy policy.