Loading...

Azure RBAC is so 2023! Let’s get ABAC to the rescue!

Azure RBAC is so 2023! Let’s get ABAC to the rescue!

This post is part of a series

I like to deploy my Azure resources using Bicep - If you never heard about it, I blogged a while ago on how to get started with Bicep - please catch up first!


In the last post, I showed you how assigning an RBAC role to a Managed Identity saves you some password rotation related tasks, and I promised to write the next post about ABAC. So here we go:

Quick recap: RBAC

Azure Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) lets admins assign roles to users, groups, and services to control access to Azure resources. With roles like Owner, Contributor and Reader, RBAC makes sure everyone has just the right permissions to get their jobs done, which cuts down on admin headaches.

But as businesses (and their cloud maturity) grow, so do their access control needs. If you’ve been managing permissions with RBAC you know it’s fabulous for broad, static access. But what happens when your access requirements start getting more complex? Enter ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control): It’s the next level of fine-grained, dynamic access control.

ABAC adds context.

Instead of just assigning permissions based on a user’s role, you can now use attributes like department, project, or even location to grant access to specific resources. Think of it as RBAC with superpowers.

A Real-World Scenario: Using RBAC and ABAC Together

Let’s say you’re running a multi-tenant SaaS app for different departments like Finance, Sales, and HR, and you need to limit access within each department. RBAC helps you set up basic roles (like Storage Contributor or Reader), but it doesn’t go far enough when users or apps only need access to specific resources, like data tagged with Finance or Project Deathstar or containers called templates or data.

That’s where ABAC comes in. You can assign broad roles with RBAC, and then fine-tune access with ABAC policies. Here’s how that works:

  • RBAC Role Assignment: John from Finance gets the Storage Contributor role, allowing him to manage all storage accounts in the Finance resource group
  • ABAC Policy: We add a rule that says our user can only access containers with the name templates. So even though his role allows him broader access, ABAC restricts him to only what’s relevant to his project.

That is exactly what principle of least privilege means!

ABAC allows you to adapt permissions on the fly based on user and resource attributes, making it perfect for dynamic environments where things change frequently – like employees working across regions or switching between projects.

Assigning ABAC Roles with Azure CLI

# Variables
$subscriptionId = "<your subscription id>"
$resourceGroupName = "<your resource group>"
$identityName = "<your managed identity or user>"
$roleName = "Storage Blob Data Contributor"
$storageAccountName = "<your storage account>"
# Get the principal ID
$identityPrincipalId = $(az identity show --resource-group $resourceGroupName --name $identityName --query 'principalId' --output tsv)
# Define the scope
$scope = "/subscriptions/$subscriptionId/resourceGroups/$resourceGroupName/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/$storageAccountName"
# Define the condition
$condition = "(@Resource[Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/blobServices/containers:name] StringEquals 'templates')"
$conditionVersion = "2.0"
# Assign the role with the condition
az role assignment create --assignee $identityPrincipalId --role $roleName --scope $scope --condition $condition --condition-version $conditionVersion

Let’s see how you can actually do this using Azure CLI. In this example, we’ll assign a Managed Identity the Storage Blob Data Contributor role and then apply an ABAC policy to restrict access to containers called templates.

We can check in the Azure Portal that this worked:

abac worked

This ABAC policy ensures that our Managed Identity (or the user in case you chose one) only gets access to the correct container name âś…

Conclusion: Better Together

Instead of asking yourself now if RBAC or ABAC is better: RBAC and ABAC aren’t competitors – they’re complementary. RBAC handles the heavy lifting of defining broad access, while ABAC gives you the flexibility to refine access based on real-world conditions. Think of ABAC as a precision tool you can use alongside RBAC when things get a little more complex.

Published on:

Learn more
Luise Freese: Consultant & MVP
Luise Freese: Consultant & MVP

Recent content on Luise Freese: Consultant & MVP

Share post:

Related posts

You are holding GitHub Copilot Wrong!

Part 0 showed why constant prompting, re-prompting, and steering GitHub Copilot feels fragile. Not because Copilot is unreliable, but because ...

8 months ago

You are holding GitHub Copilot Wrong!

Most developers think that one can’t really use GitHub Copilot wrong. There is a chat interface that lets you also choose a model, so th...

8 months ago

Building a Multi-Hierarchy Ticket Classification System (Because Keywords Aren't Enough)

Look, I love a good keyword-based system as much as the next developer. They’re fast, predictable, and when your user says “VPN,&r...

8 months ago

Secretless cross-tenant dataverse access

Client secrets are like hiding your house key under the mat; easy to grab and impossible to audit. Certificates are just slightly better, beca...

9 months ago

How Azure CLI handles your tokens and what you might be ignoring

Running az login feels like magic. A browser pops up, you pick an account, and from then on, everything just works. No more passwords, no more...

9 months ago

How Dev Proxy teaches you to make your apps more resilient

I added Microsoft Dev Proxy to my Mermaid → Dataverse converter, because I wanted to test how it handled rate limits and API errors. What I go...

10 months ago

Building Azure functions that never store secrets — ever

What if your function could hit Microsoft Graph with no client secrets, no certs, and no Key Vault entries? That is exactly what a Managed id...

10 months ago

Introducing Mermaid to Dataverse Converter

Why diagrams matter (and why they usually fail us) Entity-Relationship Diagrams (ERDs) are the universal shorthand for talking about data mode...

11 months ago

It’s OK to be seen trying

It’s OK to be seen trying Somewhere along the way, we started believing that you’re only allowed to speak after you’ve figured everything out....

1 year ago

Stuck in pilot - Part 1: no foundations, no future

“We just need to test the AI. We’ll figure out the data later.” That sentence has quietly killed more AI pilots than any model failure ever ...

1 year ago
Stay up to date with latest Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Power Platform news!
* Yes, I agree to the privacy policy