How to use customer identity and access management (CIAM) with Azure API Management
Background introduction
Microsoft Entra ID for customers is Microsoft’s new customer identity and access management (CIAM) solution designed for businesses that want to make applications available to their customers, using the Microsoft Entra platform for identity and access.
With the introduction of this feature, Microsoft Entra ID now offers a customer tenant, which is a new type of tenant that represents your customer-facing app, resources, and directory of customer accounts. A customer tenant is distinct and separate from your workforce tenant.
Microsoft Entra ID Customer Tenants is still in preview (see: Supported features in customer tenants - Microsoft Entra External ID | Microsoft Learn and Plan CIAM deployment - Microsoft Entra External ID | Microsoft Learn), but authorization token can already be used with Azure API Management (APIM).
Scenario
A consumer application uses Microsoft Entra AD to get an authorization token. The token is passed to APIM in the headers of the HTTP request and validated through a "validate-azure-ad-token" inbound policy.
=> The request is failing with a 401 Unauthorized status code.
Understanding the failure
We proceed to collect an APIM inspector trace to confirm the error obtained.
Analyzing the trace logs for the call, we can verify that the error is due to an "Issuer is not valid" error while executing API policy "validate-azure-ad-token".
We confirmed that the token being sent to APIM trace can be decoded to:
"iss": " https://00044076-b4b5-4404-b01f-00ee0c08e825.ciamlogin.com/00044076-b4b5-4404-b01f-00ee0c08e825/"
And we verified the exception on the policy to be due to an Invalid Issuer.
Exception: IDX40001: Issuer: 'https://00044076-b4b5-4404-b01f-00ee0c08e825.ciamlogin.com/00044076-b4b5-4404-b01f-00ee0c08e825/', does not match any of the valid issuers provided for this application.
Setting up a solution
The token endpoints and issuers used by the Microsoft Entra ID customer tenants differ from the Microsoft Entra ID workforce tenants (Tokens and claims overview - Microsoft identity platform | Microsoft Learn), which is the cause for the error we are facing on the “validate-azure-ad-token” policy.
Every Microsoft Entra ID tenant publishes a standards-compliant well-known metadata. This document contains information about the issuer name, the authentication and authorization endpoints, supported scopes and claims. For customer tenants, the document is publicly available at: https://{tenantname}.ciamlogin.com/{tenantid}/v2.0/.well-known/openid-configuration. This endpoint returns an issuer value https://{tenantname}.ciamlogin.com/{tenantid}/v2.0".
Example:
well-known metadata
Currently the “validate-azure-ad-token” policy does not accept CIAM tenants, but we expect this situation to change once these tenant are out of preview.
As an alternative, we can implement an equivalent "validate-jwt" policy on the APIM service (Protect API in API Management using OAuth 2.0 and Microsoft Entra ID - Azure API Management | Microsoft Learn), which is a more flexible policy to enforce the existence and validity of a supported JSON web token (JWT). In summary, this is an example for the resulting "validate-jwt" policy (Azure API Management policy reference - validate-jwt | Microsoft Learn) defined on your APIM service:
validate-jwt policy
To allow the calling application to obtain a valid v2.0 token, we must correctly configure the manifest property on the CIAM tenant (under App Registrations > Affected App >> Manifest), to “accessTokenAcceptedVersion”: 2
Example:
manifest
This allows us to obtain the v2.0 token required by APIM.
decoded token
We should note that the "aud" claim in v2 tokens is always the Client ID of the resource API, as documented here: Access token claims reference - Microsoft identity platform | Microsoft Learn.
Also in v2 tokens the "appId" claim is no longer present, and the "azp" claim should be used in its place:
azp claim
Published on:
Learn moreRelated posts
Azure Storage - TLS 1.0 and 1.1 retirement
Overview TLS 1.0 and 1.1 retirement on Azure Storage was previously announced for Nov 1st, 2024, and it was postponed recently to 1 year later...
Efficient Management of Append and Page Blobs Using Azure Storage Actions
Overview In Azure Storage, Blob Lifecycle Management (BLM) allows you to automate the management of your data based on rules defined by...
[Azure AI Search] Internal Server Error when creating CMK encrypted objects
Scenario Customers follow the Microsoft doc to create CMK encrypted objects (data source, index etc.), but get the 500 Internal Serv...
Optimizing Azure Table Storage: Automated Data Cleanup using a PowerShell script with Azure Automate
Scenario This blog’s aim is to manage Table Storage data efficiently. Imagine you have a large Azure Table Storage that accumulates logs from ...
Optimizing Azure Table Storage: Automated Data Clean-up using a PowerShell script with Azure Automat
Scenario This blog’s aim is to manage Table Storage data efficiently. Imagine you have a large Azure Table Storage that accumulates logs from ...
Restoring Soft-Deleted Blobs with multithreading in Azure Storage Using C#
Blob soft delete is an essential feature that safeguards your data against accidental deletions or overwrites. By retaining deleted data for a...
Performing simple Azure Table Storage REST API operations using curl command.
The blog provides guidance to perform simple Table Storage REST API operations such as Create table, Delete Table, Insert entity, Delete entit...
Bulk delete all the old jobs from the batch account
Deleting a Job also deletes all Tasks that are part of that Job, and all Job statistics. This also overrides the retention period for Task dat...
Utilizing Azure Storage and Runbooks for scheduled automated backups of Azure SQL Databases
In this article, we are going to provide detailed steps to create a scheduled Azure SQL Database backup to storage account using automation. T...
[Azure Service Bus] JMS messages getting dead-lettered
The article discusses a problem where numerous messages end up in the dead letter queue (DLQ) when the JMS service bus consumer connects to th...