Loading...

Quickstart: Manual Effect in Azure Policy

Quickstart: Manual Effect in Azure Policy

Recently, a new feature called “Manual effect” popped out to users and it is still in the PREVIEW stage. It allows users to self-attest the compliance of resources or scopes. In another word, it gives users a chance to determine the compliance result of the specific resource and the reason. Currently, it is mostly used inside the Security related built-in policies and initiatives. In this post, I will briefly introduce what it looks like and how it works.

 

There are multiple built-in policies under the Security category to check the subscription level compliance results with manual effect. For the built-in example, you may check “Issue public key certificates” (policy definition ID: /providers/Microsoft.Authorization/policyDefinitions/97d91b33-7050-237b-3e23-a77d57d84e13). This policy only scans the target subscriptions but does not make any additional evaluation. It gives the control to users to change the compliance results for each target subscription.

 

Following is a custom policy example to illustrate how to use the manual effect and what is the result.

 

  • Policy definition with manual effect

To illustrate the whole steps clearly, I created a custom policy which is checking the cloud services with “Prod” tag value. I set this custom policy with manual effect whose defaultState value is “Unknown”.

 

Yi_Yang_0-1672108707964.png

 

You can also use “Compliant” or “Non-compliant” as the defaultState.  All applicable resources will be set to the default state specified in the definition.

 

The following screenshot is the evaluation results after this policy was assigned to my subscription. You can see the cloud service with “Prod” tag is marked as “Unknown”, the defaultState mentioned with the manual effect.

 

Yi_Yang_0-1672046084739.png

 

Yi_Yang_1-1672044943629.png

 

  • Setting the compliance status by creating an attestation with REST API

You need to create attestations for each resource to change the compliance results of a resource or scope targeted by a manual policy. Currently, the only supported way to operate the attestation is through REST API.

 

In this example, I changed this cloud service compliance from the “Unknown” status to “Compliant” with the following REST API:

Attestations - Create Or Update At Resource - REST API (Azure Policy) | Microsoft Learn

 

You need to fill in the target resource information and the required evaluation result in the request body. The completed parameter list and their explanation can be found in the above doc link.


Following is an example to change the resource status from “Unknown” to “Compliant” with REST API.

 

Yi_Yang_0-1672109262810.png

 

Below is the request body being used for the example above: 

 

{
"properties": {
"policyAssignmentId": "/subscriptions/xx",
"complianceState": "Compliant",
"expiresOn": "2023-06-15T00:00:00Z",
"owner": "the owner principal ID",
"comments": "test one cses to Compliant from Unknown",
"evidence": [
{
"description": "test one CSESto Compliant from Unknown",
"sourceUri": "https://gist.github.com/contoso/9573e238762c60166c090ae16b814011"
}
],
"assessmentDate": "2022-12-26T06:25:00Z",
}
}

 

  • Updated compliance result

After the new assessment is completed, you will see the target resource has been changed to the required compliant result.

 

Yi_Yang_2-1672045044051.png

 

 

Reference Doc: Understand how effects work - Azure Policy | Microsoft Learn

 

 

 

Published on:

Learn more
Azure PaaS Blog articles
Azure PaaS Blog articles

Azure PaaS Blog articles

Share post:

Related posts

April Patches for Azure DevOps Server

We are releasing patches for our self‑hosted product, Azure DevOps Server. We strongly recommend that all customers remain on the latest, most...

1 day ago

Integration Testing Azure Functions with Reqnroll and C#, Part 5 - Using Corvus.Testing.ReqnRoll in a build pipeline

If you use Azure Functions on a regular basis, you'll likely have grappled with the challenge of testing them. In the final post in this serie...

5 days ago

Integration Testing Azure Functions with Reqnroll and C#, Part 4 - Controlling your functions with additional configuration

If you use Azure Functions on a regular basis, you'll likely have grappled with the challenge of testing them. In the fourth of this series of...

5 days ago

Integration Testing Azure Functions with Reqnroll and C#, Part 3 - Using hooks to start Functions

If you use Azure Functions on a regular basis, you'll likely have grappled with the challenge of testing them. In the third of a series of pos...

5 days ago

Integration Testing Azure Functions with Reqnroll and C#, Part 2 - Using step bindings to start Functions

If you use Azure Functions on a regular basis, you'll likely have grappled with the challenge of testing them. In the second of a series of po...

5 days ago

Integration Testing Azure Functions with Reqnroll and C#, Part 1 - Introduction

If you use Azure Functions on a regular basis, you'll likely have grappled with the challenge of testing them. In the first of a series of pos...

5 days ago

Announcing Azure MCP Server 2.0 Stable Release for Self-Hosted Agentic Cloud Automation

Azure MCP Server 2.0 is now generally available, delivering first-class self-hosting, stronger security hardening, and a faster foundation for...

5 days ago

Azure Security: Private Vs. Service Endpoints

When connecting securely to a platform service such as a key vault or an Azure storage account, Microsoft recommends using a private endpoint ...

6 days ago
Stay up to date with latest Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Power Platform news!
* Yes, I agree to the privacy policy