Loading...

Quickstart: Manual Effect in Azure Policy

Quickstart: Manual Effect in Azure Policy

Recently, a new feature called “Manual effect” popped out to users and it is still in the PREVIEW stage. It allows users to self-attest the compliance of resources or scopes. In another word, it gives users a chance to determine the compliance result of the specific resource and the reason. Currently, it is mostly used inside the Security related built-in policies and initiatives. In this post, I will briefly introduce what it looks like and how it works.

 

There are multiple built-in policies under the Security category to check the subscription level compliance results with manual effect. For the built-in example, you may check “Issue public key certificates” (policy definition ID: /providers/Microsoft.Authorization/policyDefinitions/97d91b33-7050-237b-3e23-a77d57d84e13). This policy only scans the target subscriptions but does not make any additional evaluation. It gives the control to users to change the compliance results for each target subscription.

 

Following is a custom policy example to illustrate how to use the manual effect and what is the result.

 

  • Policy definition with manual effect

To illustrate the whole steps clearly, I created a custom policy which is checking the cloud services with “Prod” tag value. I set this custom policy with manual effect whose defaultState value is “Unknown”.

 

Yi_Yang_0-1672108707964.png

 

You can also use “Compliant” or “Non-compliant” as the defaultState.  All applicable resources will be set to the default state specified in the definition.

 

The following screenshot is the evaluation results after this policy was assigned to my subscription. You can see the cloud service with “Prod” tag is marked as “Unknown”, the defaultState mentioned with the manual effect.

 

Yi_Yang_0-1672046084739.png

 

Yi_Yang_1-1672044943629.png

 

  • Setting the compliance status by creating an attestation with REST API

You need to create attestations for each resource to change the compliance results of a resource or scope targeted by a manual policy. Currently, the only supported way to operate the attestation is through REST API.

 

In this example, I changed this cloud service compliance from the “Unknown” status to “Compliant” with the following REST API:

Attestations - Create Or Update At Resource - REST API (Azure Policy) | Microsoft Learn

 

You need to fill in the target resource information and the required evaluation result in the request body. The completed parameter list and their explanation can be found in the above doc link.


Following is an example to change the resource status from “Unknown” to “Compliant” with REST API.

 

Yi_Yang_0-1672109262810.png

 

Below is the request body being used for the example above: 

 

{
"properties": {
"policyAssignmentId": "/subscriptions/xx",
"complianceState": "Compliant",
"expiresOn": "2023-06-15T00:00:00Z",
"owner": "the owner principal ID",
"comments": "test one cses to Compliant from Unknown",
"evidence": [
{
"description": "test one CSESto Compliant from Unknown",
"sourceUri": "https://gist.github.com/contoso/9573e238762c60166c090ae16b814011"
}
],
"assessmentDate": "2022-12-26T06:25:00Z",
}
}

 

  • Updated compliance result

After the new assessment is completed, you will see the target resource has been changed to the required compliant result.

 

Yi_Yang_2-1672045044051.png

 

 

Reference Doc: Understand how effects work - Azure Policy | Microsoft Learn

 

 

 

Published on:

Learn more
Azure PaaS Blog articles
Azure PaaS Blog articles

Azure PaaS Blog articles

Share post:

Related posts

Azure Storage - TLS 1.0 and 1.1 retirement

Overview TLS 1.0 and 1.1 retirement on Azure Storage was previously announced for Nov 1st, 2024, and it was postponed recently to 1 year later...

1 year ago

Efficient Management of Append and Page Blobs Using Azure Storage Actions

  Overview In Azure Storage, Blob Lifecycle Management (BLM) allows you to automate the management of your data based on rules defined by...

1 year ago

[Azure AI Search] Internal Server Error when creating CMK encrypted objects

Scenario Customers follow the Microsoft doc to create CMK encrypted objects (data source, index etc.), but get the 500 Internal Serv...

1 year ago

Optimizing Azure Table Storage: Automated Data Cleanup using a PowerShell script with Azure Automate

Scenario This blog’s aim is to manage Table Storage data efficiently. Imagine you have a large Azure Table Storage that accumulates logs from ...

1 year ago

Optimizing Azure Table Storage: Automated Data Clean-up using a PowerShell script with Azure Automat

Scenario This blog’s aim is to manage Table Storage data efficiently. Imagine you have a large Azure Table Storage that accumulates logs from ...

1 year ago

Restoring Soft-Deleted Blobs with multithreading in Azure Storage Using C#

Blob soft delete is an essential feature that safeguards your data against accidental deletions or overwrites. By retaining deleted data for a...

1 year ago

Performing simple Azure Table Storage REST API operations using curl command.

The blog provides guidance to perform simple Table Storage REST API operations such as Create table, Delete Table, Insert entity, Delete entit...

1 year ago

Bulk delete all the old jobs from the batch account

Deleting a Job also deletes all Tasks that are part of that Job, and all Job statistics. This also overrides the retention period for Task dat...

1 year ago

Utilizing Azure Storage and Runbooks for scheduled automated backups of Azure SQL Databases

In this article, we are going to provide detailed steps to create a scheduled Azure SQL Database backup to storage account using automation. T...

2 years ago

[Azure Service Bus] JMS messages getting dead-lettered

The article discusses a problem where numerous messages end up in the dead letter queue (DLQ) when the JMS service bus consumer connects to th...

2 years ago
Stay up to date with latest Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Power Platform news!
* Yes, I agree to the privacy policy