Loading...

Azure Well-Architected Review Assessment Updates

Azure Well-Architected Review Assessment Updates

Azure Well-Architected Review Assessment Updates

Microsoft is excited to announce a significant update to the Azure Well-Architected Review assessment helps you build and optimize workloads. It walks you through a series of questions about your workload. Based on your responses, it generates tailored and prioritized recommendations to improve your workload design. The guidance is actionable and applicable to nearly every workload. It aligns with the latest best practices across the five key pillars of reliability, security, cost optimization, operational excellence, and performance efficiency (see figure 1).

 

brauerblogs_0-1699919238705.png

 

Figure 1. The landing page for the Azure Well-Architected Review assessment.

 

Overview of the assessment updates

The assessment updates reflect the insights of experts around the world. After years of collaborating with customers, these experts provided targeted updates to reflect the most critical needs of customers in the current technical landscape. Every question, answer, and recommendation now feature the latest best practices in workload management across the five pillars.

 

In the Azure Well-Architected Review assessment, there are five different workload types to choose from. The updates discussed here apply to the Core Well-Architected Review option only (see figure 2).

 

brauerblogs_1-1699919238722.png

Figure 2. The workload options in the Azure Well-Architected Review assessment. Discussed updates only apply to the Core Well-Architected Review.

 

The Core Well-Architected Review focuses on the workload design principles applicable to every workload and workload team. It’s structured around the five pillars of the Azure Well-Achitected Framework guidance. Let's explore the specific changes in each pillar of the Core-Well Architected Review:

 

  • Reliability includes defining health states, recovery processes, and redundancy design. It offers insights into conducting disaster recovery drills and monitoring health states with alerts, helping to improve workload reliability.
  • Security covers key topics such as securing high-impact accounts, firewall implementation, and distributed denial of service (DDoS) protection. It provides recommendations for maintaining up-to-date software and infrastructure, along with training in hardening techniques, to enhance the security posture of your Azure workload.
  • Cost Optimization addresses strategies for optimizing licensing costs and managing financial expectations, including access control for spending. It offers guidance on workload cost estimation, aligning usage with billing increments, and resource consolidation to achieve cost efficiency.
  • Operational Excellence focuses on safe deployment practices, workload responsibility, and infrastructure-as-code utilization. It emphasizes the importance of process documentation, standardized coding practices, and task automation to achieve operational consistency in Azure environments.
  • Performance Efficiency involves evaluating performance requirements, analyzing testing results, and strategies for effective scaling. Recommendations cover designing scalable infrastructure and applications, and for ongoing performance optimization.

For any assessment, you can select one or all the pillars to work through. You receive the greatest benefit by addressing all the pillars, then starting new milestones to improve targeted areas (see figure 3).

 

brauerblogs_2-1699919238737.png

Figure 3. The core pillar selection page.

 

Benefits of the assessment update

The assessment updates target universal workload design best practices. You can run the assessment on any workload in any platform, not only those in Azure. The assessment covers more aspects of your workload at a deeper technical level. Even though it’s more comprehensive, it’s also faster to complete. It has 20+ more unique recommendations (375 total) than the previous version of the assessment, but it also has 124 fewer choices to work through. This means you get more tailored guidance with less input required. Even the wording of the assessment provides a better experience. There’s a consistent style and structure in the wording (see figure 4).

 

brauerblogs_3-1699919238770.png

Figure 4. Example of the updated assessment style and structure consistency. Viewing the assessment question that aligns with SE:05 Identity and access management.

 

The new wording makes the assessment easier to understand and faster to complete. Together, these changes provide more nuanced guidance to improve your workload with less effort required to complete the assessment. It frees you to revisit the assessment more often.

The guidance you receive at the end of an assessment aligns with the revised Azure Well-Architected Framework.

 

The assessment follows the same structure as the framework, and every recommendation has guidance in the framework. It’s important to note that the guidance in the Azure Well-Architected Framework incorporates important The priority for each recommendation has also been updated to reflect their priority in the current technology landscape (see figure 5).

 

brauerblogs_4-1699919238777.png

Figure 5. Sample of the recommended actions after completing an assessment.

 

Each recommendation starts with a code, such as “SE:05”. The code is an abbreviation for the pillar name it corresponds to and a number that indicates the specific articles in the Azure Well-Architected Framework it pulls from. For example, the code “SE:05” corresponds to the guidance on identity and access management in the Azure Well-Architected Framework (see figure 6).

 

brauerblogs_5-1699919238787.png

Figure 6. The checklist from the Security pillar. It shows how the recommendation code aligns with the guidance in each pillar. The code in the Checklist table has corresponding guides in the table of contents on the left.

 

The codes for each pillar are “RE” for reliability, “SE” for security, “CO” for cost optimization, “OE” for operational excellence, and “PE” for performance efficiency. There are one or more articles in the framework associated with each code. Because a code corresponds to a broad topic, like Identity and access management, a single code precedes multiple assessment recommended actions.

 

Features the assessment updates didn’t change

Despite the comprehensive updates, the key functionalities of the assessment remain unchanged. You can still initiate new assessments, create milestones, and access the latest recommendations based on their responses. The to view all recommendations and export recommendations to a downloadable CSV (see figure 7).

 

brauerblogs_6-1699919238795.png

Figure 7. The ability to export the recommendations for your workload to a CSV that you can download.

 

It will still integrate with Azure Advisor, and the ability to name assessments and milestones remains the same.

 

All new assessments and milestones will automatically revert to the new assessment updates. Your previous session responses will still be available, but prior responses won’t be applied to the new milestones to ensure alignment with the most current guidance.

 

Conclusion

In summary, the updated Azure Well-Architected Review assessment reflects a move towards a more detailed, nuanced approach across all pillars. These improvements demonstrate Microsoft's commitment to helping customers build and maintain efficient, secure, and resilient cloud architectures.

 

To learn more about the WAF refresh, see the new hub page for the Well-Architected Framework: aka.ms/waf

or Uli Homann's blog post: https://aka.ms/whatsnewinwaf

 

Dom Allen has also created a great, 6-minute video on the Azure Enablement Show

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Published on:

Learn more
Azure Architecture Blog articles
Azure Architecture Blog articles

Azure Architecture Blog articles

Share post:

Related posts

Announcing the stable release of Azure Event Grid Namespaces HTTP client libraries

This post announces stable release of the HTTP Azure Event Grid Namespaces client libraries in .NET, Java, JavaScript, Python, and Go. The pos...

4 hours ago

Portal extension for Azure Firewall with DDoS protection

Introduction In the ever-evolving landscape of network security, Azure Firewall has emerged as a key player. As a managed, cloud-based network...

10 hours ago

Generative AI with Azure Cosmos DB

Leverage Azure Cosmos DB for generative AI workloads for automatic scalability, low latency, and global distribution to handle massive data vo...

17 hours ago

Enhancing Document Extraction with Azure AI Document Intelligence and LangChain for RAG Workflows.

Overview. The broadening of conventional data engineering pipelines and applications to include document extraction and preprocessing for ...

18 hours ago

Azure Capacity Reservations with Automatic Consumption

Solving the ask – Automatic Capacity Reservations Historically, the setting to use a Capacity Reservations Groups must be defined while the vi...

1 day ago

Announcing Preview of New Azure Dlsv6, Dsv6, Esv6 VMs with new CPU, Azure Boost, and NVMe Support

Co-authored by Andy Jia, Principal Product Manager, and Misha Bansal, Technical Program Manager, Azure Compute   We are thrilled to annou...

2 days ago

Comparing feature sets for AKS enabled by Azure Arc deployment options

This article shows a comparison of features available for the different deployment options under AKS enabled by Azure Arc.    ...

2 days ago

Azure Fluid Relay: Leveraging Azure Blob Storage to scale Git

Learn how to leverage Git as a storage mechanism behind the globally available Azure Fluid Relay (AFR) service. The post Azure Fluid Relay: Le...

3 days ago
Stay up to date with latest Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Power Platform news!
* Yes, I agree to the privacy policy