Azure Functions: V2 Python Programming Model
Azure Functions: V2 Python Programming Model
The Azure Functions team released the V2 programming model for Python, learn more about the offering and try it out today!
The v2 programming model is designed to provide a Functions development experience that is more familiar to Python developers. Key features include triggers and bindings declared as decorators, importing through blueprints, and easy to reference documentation.
With the V2 programming model, customers will benefit from:
- A simplified folder structure, where there will be fewer files within a function application. Multiple functions in the application can now be defined in the same file.
- Triggers and bindings will be represented as decorators, eliminating the need for the `function.json` configuration file.
- Streamlined workflow with importing through blueprints. Blueprints will also promote logical grouping of functions within the application.
- Documentation is more easily accessible with a new ‘View Template’ option in VS Code.
The v2 new programming model enables customers to create function applications with ease – leaning towards fewer Functions concepts, and instead emphasizing Python principles. Furthermore, it provides an easier import experience, requires fewer files, and is supported by easy to reference documentation. Note that leveraging the v2 model will alter the way you create functions, but the underlying experience when it comes to monitoring, debugging, and deployment will remain the same.
Folder Structure
The structure of function apps with the new Python programming model has been simplified. When creating a new function within a function application, there will no longer be a new folder required. Instead, all functions within the function application can be defined in a single file, `function_app.py`. The file, `function.json`, where triggers and bindings were configured in the v1 model, will also no longer be required. Instead, triggers and bindings will be configured in `function_app.py` alongside function definitions. Triggers and bindings will now be represented as decorators, simulating an experience similar to well-known Python frameworks.
Following is a side-by-side comparison of the programming models, highlighting the difference in changes.
Sample folder structure using the v1 and v2 programming model
Blueprints
The v2 programming model introduces the concept of blueprints. A blueprint is a new class instantiated to register functions outside of the core function application. The functions registered in blueprint instances aren't indexed directly by function runtime. To get these blueprint functions indexed, the function app needs to register the functions from blueprint instances.
Using blueprints, developers can define functions in multiple Python files, promoting logical grouping of functions within the function app into modular components. Blueprints also provide extensible public function app interfaces to build and reuse APIs.
Decorator Based
In the v2 programming model, triggers and bindings will be represented as decorators. This aligns with well-known Python frameworks and will result in functions being written in much fewer lines of code. Using decorators will also eliminate the need for the configuration file ‘function.json’, and promote a simpler, easier to learn model.
Documentation
Documentation will be more readily accessible and easier to reference with PyDocs. As shown below, when declaring triggers and bindings, in depth documentation is available from the moment one starts typing.
Documentation and hints are available during development
Furthermore, when creating a new function in Visual Studio Code, customers will have the option to “Preview Template” before creating a function. This will enable customers to learn about the trigger and view the code without creating the function or leaving the IDE.
Option to "Preview Template" in VS Code to learn more about the trigger
Next Steps
Try out the v2 programming model today!
Getting started with terminal/command prompt
Known limitations and workarounds
We’d love to hear your thoughts and feedback, let us know by posting your comments on this discussion.
Published on:
Learn moreRelated posts
Azure Toolkit for IntelliJ: Introducing the enhanced Java Code Quality Analyzer!
Discover the latest updates to the Azure Toolkit for IntelliJ, featuring an enhanced Java Code Quality Analyzer to help you write cleaner, saf...
Azure Boards + GitHub: Recent Updates
Over the past several months, we’ve delivered a series of improvements to the Azure Boards + GitHub integration. Whether you’re tracking...
Introducing the Azure MCP Server
This post introduces the Azure MCP Server, bringing the power of the cloud to your AI agents. The post Introducing the Azure MCP Server appear...
Azure OpenAI Service now authorized for all U.S. Government data classification levels
In the coming years, artificial intelligence will continue to be foundational to technical innovations for national security missions. Already...
GPT-4.1 is now available at Azure AI Foundry
Azure AI Foundry and AOAI (Azure OpenAI Services) keeps on getting better all the time! The latest addition in Azure AI Foundry (as of April 1...
Introducing Region Selection in Azure Cosmos DB Data Explorer for NoSQL Accounts
You asked—we delivered! Users can now manually select the region Data Explorer sends requests to! When you use Entra Authentication with NoSQL...
Microsoft Attempts to Fix Microsoft Graph PowerShell SDK Problem with Azure Automation
V2.26 and V2.26.1 of the Microsoft Graph PowerShell SDK were low-quality, buggy disasters. Microsoft aims to fix the problem in the next versi...